Home /
News /
In-depth news /
Cohesion policy
next > < previous
Cohesion policy

Cohesion policy - 25.11.2015
A look at the involvement of towns, regions and their associations in the implementation of the cohesion policy
With the help of its member associations, the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR) carried out a study on the degree of involvement of towns, regions and their national associations in the delivering of cohesion policy funds. The study shows that the respect of the partnership principle in this implementation phase varies a lot from one Member State to another.
Many European countries have not yet complied with their obligation to cooperate with towns, regions and their associations
Since 2014 national governments are legally obliged to create a working partnership with both local and regional governments when designing and delivering EU funds. Although most local governments are involved directly and/or through their national associations in the delivering of EU funds, their implication strongly depends, for instance, on the type of partnership with the bodies in charge of delivering the funds (managing authorities, like national ministers). Furthermore, in several cases, the regions have more influence over governmental decisions than towns and cities.
The evidence found and presented in the study also shows that in many cases, like in Austria or Belgium, national associations of local government merely accomplish an information role – by disseminating activities through publications and events - but they are hardly involved in discussions with the managing authorities.
A high priority is given to urban areas
The Commission set an instrument aiming to deliver EU funds simultaneously in urban and rural areas, taking into account the linkages between both dimensions: the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs). However, another CEMR study on the use of the ITIs reveals that despite its creation, most of the plans are exclusively targeting urban areas. This is the case in England, where 10% of EU Regional development fund is being spent on sustainable urban development in the 8 main cities.
Unfortunately, this does not reflect the needs on the ground. Today, Europe is characterised by a high number of small and medium-sized cities, and almost 80% of rural population lives close to urban areas. Therefore, the ITIs should not apply solely to urban areas but rather to towns and cities and their surrounding areas to carry on cross-sectoral actions with the help of EU funds, as repeatedly supported by CEMR.
CEMR together with its national member associations covering all EU Member States are keen to contribute to further deepening the partnership principle both in terms of monitoring its application and to draw the appropriate lessons for the next programming period.
Many European countries have not yet complied with their obligation to cooperate with towns, regions and their associations
Since 2014 national governments are legally obliged to create a working partnership with both local and regional governments when designing and delivering EU funds. Although most local governments are involved directly and/or through their national associations in the delivering of EU funds, their implication strongly depends, for instance, on the type of partnership with the bodies in charge of delivering the funds (managing authorities, like national ministers). Furthermore, in several cases, the regions have more influence over governmental decisions than towns and cities.
The evidence found and presented in the study also shows that in many cases, like in Austria or Belgium, national associations of local government merely accomplish an information role – by disseminating activities through publications and events - but they are hardly involved in discussions with the managing authorities.
A high priority is given to urban areas
The Commission set an instrument aiming to deliver EU funds simultaneously in urban and rural areas, taking into account the linkages between both dimensions: the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs). However, another CEMR study on the use of the ITIs reveals that despite its creation, most of the plans are exclusively targeting urban areas. This is the case in England, where 10% of EU Regional development fund is being spent on sustainable urban development in the 8 main cities.
Unfortunately, this does not reflect the needs on the ground. Today, Europe is characterised by a high number of small and medium-sized cities, and almost 80% of rural population lives close to urban areas. Therefore, the ITIs should not apply solely to urban areas but rather to towns and cities and their surrounding areas to carry on cross-sectoral actions with the help of EU funds, as repeatedly supported by CEMR.
CEMR together with its national member associations covering all EU Member States are keen to contribute to further deepening the partnership principle both in terms of monitoring its application and to draw the appropriate lessons for the next programming period.
Contact

Marine Gaudron
Officer - Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Local Finances
Email :
Tel : +32 2 213 86 93
Skype : marine.gaudron
Additional information
CEMR study: “Analysis of the respect for the partnership principle during the implementation phase of European Structural and Investment Funds” is a follow-up of CEMR study on the partnership principle, published in 2014.
CEMR also updated its study on the use of Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs): “An overview of the implementation of the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs) by Member States.”
CEMR study: “Analysis of the respect for the partnership principle during the implementation phase of European Structural and Investment Funds” is a follow-up of CEMR study on the partnership principle, published in 2014.
CEMR also updated its study on the use of Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs): “An overview of the implementation of the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs) by Member States.”
